Category: Sexual Immorality (Page 1 of 10)
I’m convinced Barrack Obama is a Luciferian and a sold out servant of Satan. Who actually willingly submits to and follows Satan . And if that is the case he would have the mind of Satan who is diabolical, subtle, and deceiving, in his ways and who operates as a wolf in sheep’s clothing.
Which makes him a very diabolical, devious, and evil man. Practically every policy he’s implemented is tearing this county apart. And I’m convinced that’s his goal to tear this country apart. But yet people still admire and praise him.
The black community in particular above all else fawns over him when he has done nothing for them and even after he basically encouraged them to drink lead tainted water and claimed it was safe to drink. They still love and adore him and are convinced he loves them and has their best interest in mind, lol. And I’m convinced many of Joe Biden’s radical plans are influenced by Barrack Obama to the detriment of this nation. You can’t make this stuff up.
By Donald Bohanon
TTPAS has no affiliation or association with WSHH they are just the source of this terrible advice.
In the video above the young lady tries to rationalize disloyal behavior in the form of cheating by suggesting that it’s okay because the person who cheated really doesn’t belong to the person they cheated on. This is this new generation’s way to justify being disloyal and promiscuous in relationships.
But the truth of the matter is this new generation is simply a selfish generation that glorifies, promotes, and justifies selfishness. Many in this new generation are only focused on pleasing themselves regardless of how that affects the other person in the relationship. They refuse to accept responsibility for bad behavior but instead try to justify it as a form of freedom to do whatever pleases them.
And they call that behavior freedom. But the Bible outlines and is further supported by social and behavioral studies and the many instances of people being treated for and struggling with sexual addictions, drug addictions, alcohol addictions, etc. This behavior, in reality, as the Bible outlines, is very enslaving and shackling.
There is no freedom when given the ability to do whatever you choose, whenever you choose, with whomever you choose. Many studies have shown continued participation in this kind of self-destructive behavior produces a situation where the participant loses all self-control and is eventually enslaved by the very behavior they call freeing and liberating.
At which point they eventually need to seek professional help to overcome the alcohol, sex, or drug addiction, etc. God in his infinite wisdom saw ahead of time that this behavior would prove problematic and destructive for the individuals who engaged in it so he gave us instructions and rules to follow to ensure we didn’t fall victim to the enslaving clutches of these types of sinful behaviors.
That’s why God in his word the Bible tells us the truth expressed in his word regarding these matters when followed will set you free from their enslaving clutches. Following the rules set by God that define proper moral behavior is what frees us from the enslaving shackles of sinful immoral behavior. Because we’re living in a way that won’t expose us to its shackling effects and or consequences.
The new message of liberation through sexual freedom is in reality a carefully constructed ploy by Satan to ensure many people are eventually shackled and enslaved, by engaging in sinful sexual behavior under the false cloak of liberating behavior.
This new generation frowns on marriage because it requires sacrificing your desires for the needs of your spouse, commitment to your spouse, consideration for the feelings of your spouse, respect for your spouse, etc.
All of which are counterproductive and contrary to the woke doctrine of self first and doing what pleases you regardless of how destructive it is and how it negatively impacts, destroys, and undermines, the lives of those they claim to love, and the societies they live in.
The young lady in the video above suggests that, in so many words, if you even cheat in marriage its not cheating because the person who cheated doesn’t belong to you. But that’s easier said than done when the person actually becomes deeply emotionally involved in the relationship. In cases like that disloyal behavior can be very dangerous and can even prove deadly. And that’s not how God views it. In the eyes of God marriage means that the person you marry in essence becomes your property. But not to abuse or harm but to love in an unselfish manner.
Which means putting the needs of your spouse above yours. In other words, the husband must put the needs of his wife above his and the wife must put the needs of her husband above hers. While following the instructions for marriage and moral behavior outlined in the Bible. This is how true love and loyalty blossom and is cultivated in the marriage. And when this same model is applied in societies it has the same love building and cultivating effect.
Being disloyal in relationships and marriages only builds distrust, anger, bitterness, resentment, hatred, etc, all of which are the antithesis of love and undermine and destroy love, trust, and loyalty, etc. And the abandonment of these things is the origin of resentment, disloyalty, anger, bitterness, mistrust, and hatred. Which in turn produce, sorrow, sadness, suffering, and even death.
The new Satan-inspired woke doctrine of liberation through sexual freedom, in reality, is the quickest way to get enslaved by one of the most addicting behaviors known to man which is sexual promiscuity.
And this form of addiction is very difficult to overcome. It also gives birth to other forms of self-destructive behavior all of which are offensive to God and will be judged harshly and can lead to spiritual destruction as well.
Satan is promoting the liberation through sexual freedom lie in the end time because he knows it’s one of the most effective and enslaving methods available to ensure many are destroyed both physically and spiritually.
If you don’t want to follow a set of rules that apply to relationships then just don’t get involved in a relationship or a marriage. And if you are in a relationship or marriage respect your mate and treat them the way you would want to be treated. Playing with people’s emotions can have deadly consequences.
TTPAS has no affiliation or association with WSHH they are just the source of this information.
This is something I have been aware of for some time now but not many others have. And although I.G. models can serve as eye candy for many I’m not sure if I.G. would serve as the ideal venue for searching for a serious or committed relationship or a wife. This is not to say that all I.G. models engage in the practice of selling their bodies to get ahead in life.
I’m sure there are many women on I.G. who have legitimate jobs , careers, businesses, etc. Not all are exhibitionists or for sale. But I would reiterate I still don’t think I.G. is the place to look for a quality woman with self respect and morals as the Bible defines it. Neither am I condemning those who do engage in these practices, that is between them and God. I also know there can be serious underlying issues and circumstances that can motivate and feed into this kind of behavior.
Desperation if you are not grounded and governed by faith and a set of godly principles can make many people both men and women do things they wouldn’t normally do. It’s a cold cruel world out there and unfortunately its only going to get colder and crueler. And many, unfortunately, will eventually be forced to do things they never thought they would do as a result of desperation and necessity. But supporting and promoting an atmosphere and individuals who demand that type of compliance with that kind of pay to play mentality certainly doesn’t help either.
And I’m sure the rationale with many I.G. models is why not have sex for hundreds of thousands of dollars once or twice with one or two individuals as opposed to having sex with multiple tricks for 50–100 dollars a pop. That kind of reasoning would make sense and be appealing to many women in similar situations.
And I’m sure many of those I.G. models have been faced with circumstances that created desperation and a sense of urgency. I’m not condoning the behavior I’m just not here to judge it because of the reasons outlined above. We are just providing this video as way to shed some light on the subject.
I don’t normally comment on these kinds of stories unless I have absolute proof that they actually occurred. Because I know how deceitful, spiteful, malicious, and just outright evil people can be.
The accused in question has actually admitted that this event actually took place and he did have sex with the young lady claiming she told him she was older.
But the mother now claims to have met him and I’m sure she had to have told him the young lady was just 15 years old. I find the fact that a 22-year-old man wants to hang out with a fifteen-year-old very disturbing and troubling.
And I find it strange that in the me-too movement more people and women, in general, haven’t come out in condemnation of this.
Recent Executive Order and upcoming “Equality Act” part of new wave of bizarre “rights.”
Undefined radical terms being put into law!
By Amy Contrada
January 28, 2021
[Republished from American Thinker with some additions and changes.]
On the afternoon of January 20, Biden issued an Executive Order demanding “equal treatment under the law, no matter [one’s] gender identity or sexual orientation.” This is just the first salvo in the next wave pushing “LGBT rights.” The order will soon be backed by federal law, via the pending LGBT “Equality Act.”
While many are now warning the order will destroy girls’ and women’s sports, the order’s impact is much broader.
The enforcers will be handed free rein to transform society in unimaginable ways,given the undefined terms in the order and pending law: gender identity, sexual orientation, LGBT. Why has there been no pushback on embedding these sexual-radical concepts in our legal system?
Establishment conservatives have shied away from addressing this issue and denigrate anyone who dares to confront it. They don’t want to be called “anti-gay” or “uncompassionate” towards the “gender confused.” (In 2018, MassResistance was banned from CPAC for our outspoken opposition to the transgender movement. See more here and here.)
Yet now, conservative commentators complain about boys taking over girls’ sports and locker rooms. Too little, too late.
Biden’s LGBT Executive Order
Biden’s Executive Order (EO) targets “discrimination” based on “gender identity and sexual orientation.” Anywhere existing statutes or regulations prohibit “sex discrimination,” the EO instructs all federal agencies to review and revise regulations as necessary to include “gender identity and sexual orientation.”
Justice Neil Gorsuch’s absurd ruling in Bostock , which radically re-defined Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to include “sexual orientation” and “gender identity” as official Civil Rights protections, is cited as one basis for this EO. The woke EO even references the radicals’ idea about “overlapping areas of discrimination,” called “intersectionality,” that deserve special notice.
As we often see from the Left, the EO’s introductory paragraph is emotionally manipulative, mentioning respect, dignity, love, children, one’s true self, and people just wanting “a roof over their head”:
Every person should be treated with respect and dignity and should be able to live without fear, no matter who they are or whom they love. Children should be able to learn without worrying about whether they will be denied access to the restroom, the locker room, or school sports. Adults should be able to earn a living and pursue a vocation knowing that they will not be fired, demoted, or mistreated because of whom they go home to or because how they dress does not conform to sex-based stereotypes.
But nowhere does the EO define the new terms at issue.
LGBT “Equality Act”
As of this writing, the so-called Equality Act has not yet been filed in the new 117th Congress. But you can see last session’s Equality Act bill here.
The Equality Act’s stated goal is “to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex, gender identity, and sexual orientation, and for other purposes.” (What are the “other purposes”?) The bill employs the phrase “lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (referred to as ‘LGBTQ’).” That’s as close to a definition it gets.
Anywhere discrimination on the basis of sex appears in the law, the new terms gender identity, and sexual orientation will be added. That includes laws on public accommodations, employment, housing, credit, education, federally funded programs, jury service, and child welfare programs.
One foreboding clause states:
The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993… shall not provide a claim concerning, or a defense to a claim under, a covered title, or provide a basis for challenging the application or enforcement of a covered title.
So, destroying religious freedom on these issues is one of the “other purposes” of the Equality Act.
What exactly will be protected under the terms “gender identity” and “sexual orientation” in Biden’s EO and the Equality Act? No actual definitions are given. So we must look elsewhere for hints.
The whole idea of “gender” is recent – and irrational. It’s basically an evolving theoretical construct disseminated by sexual radical academics, political activists, and allies in the medical establishment. But what we’ve seen play out so far under cover of “transgender rights” reveals it as pure lunacy.
Massachusetts law includes a silly circular definition of “gender identity.” The relevant section states:
”Gender identity” shall mean a person’s gender-related identity, appearance or behavior, whether or not that gender-related identity, appearance or behavior is different from that traditionally associated with the person’s physiology or assigned sex at birth. Gender-related identity may be shown by providing evidence including, but not limited to, medical history, care or treatment of the gender-related identity, consistent and uniform assertion of the gender-related identity or any other evidence that the gender-related identity is sincerely held as part of a person’s core identity…
In a ridiculous attempt to explain it, The Massachusetts Attorney General writes, “In essence, gender identity is a person’s internal sense of their own gender.” So “gender” is just what an individual thinks about himself, unconnected to the reality around him. But we all must “respect” his delusion. We are also presented with the absurd phrase, “sex assigned at birth,” which negates the scientific reality of the distinction between biological male and female.
The far-left Human Rights Campaign has an equally absurd definition:
Gender identity: One’s innermost concept of self as male, female, a blend of both or neither – how individuals perceive themselves and what they call themselves. One’s gender identity can be the same or different from their sex assigned at birth.
Already, we’ve seen this nonsense allow for glaring abuses in language, schools, sports, public accommodations, healthcare, insurance, and businesses. It has led to children being confused and indoctrinated; some are having their bodies destroyed and sterilized by puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgical mutilations.
Lacking any rational legal definition, who can imagine what further demands will be justified under the “gender identity” umbrella?
What exactly is “sexual orientation”? Massachusetts law includes a disturbing hint of what could come our way, among other things, if Biden’s EO and the Equality Act law are enforced: legalized pedophilia.
Where Massachusetts law mentions “sexual orientation” (as protected from discrimination), the term is immediately followed by the phrase, “which shall not include persons whose sexual orientation involves minor children as the sex object.” Clearly, pedophilia can be considered a sexual orientation.
But the EO and Equality Act do not limit “sexual orientation” in this way. Nor do they exclude other reprehensible and dangerous practices which could be considered sexual orientations such as BDSM, polygamy, prostitution, bestiality, pornography addiction.
The radical homosexual advocacy group Human Rights Campaign defines sexual orientation as, “An inherent or immutable enduring emotional, romantic or sexual attraction to other people” – also without any limitation on who those “other people” might be. That syrupy reference to emotion and romance helps cover over the dangerous promiscuity common to many in the “LGBT community.” And HRC repeats the false claim that sexual orientation is “inherent or immutable.”
The Equality Act uses the acronym LGBTQ [no +] without defining it. We’ve been told that LGBT stands for “lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender.” The meaning of the long-standing words “lesbian” and “gay” are obvious – but what exactly are “bisexual,” “transgender,” and “queer” (Q)?
Here is how the Human Rights Campaign defines the Q for “queer”:
Queer: A term people often use to express a spectrum of identities and orientations that are counter to the mainstream. Queer is often used as a catch-all to include many people, including those who do not identify as exclusively straight and/or folks who have non-binary or gender-expansive identities.
In a recent interview with Philadelphia Gay News (Oct. 2020), Biden went even further and added + (a plus sign) to the LGBTQ acronym. He promised the moon to the “LGBTQ+” community and said he would guarantee transgender housing. He said, “It’s about dignity, plain and simple.” But what does that + (plus sign) mean?
The ruling elite wants free rein to keep expanding their reach without limit of legal definitions. That’s what the + means!
What we’re experiencing is the perversion of language for use as a political weapon. Orwell explained this in “The Principles of Newspeak”:
The purpose of Newspeak was not only to provide a medium of expression for the world-view and mental habits proper to the [ruling regime], but to make all other modes of thought impossible….
This was done partly by the invention of new words, but chiefly by eliminating undesirable words and by stripping such words as remained of unorthodox meanings…. Newspeak was designed not to extend but to diminish the range of thought…
New words and phrases invented by the Left:
sexual orientation – gay – gay marriage – bisexual – gender – gender identity – transgender – [pronouns] zie, zir, they, them – queer – LGBTQ+ – questioning – pansexual – nonbinary – genderqueer – sex assigned at birth – who they are – hate speech – hate crime – love is love – social justice
Undesirable words and phrases the Left is attempting to eliminate:
God – faith – Bible – truth – free speech – freedom of the press – Constitution -Founding Fathers – abortion – morality – perversion – modesty – sodomy – mother – father – son – daughter – parental rights
Words and phrases that are being stripped of unorthodox (unapproved) meanings:
sex – man – woman – boy – girl – marriage – family – human rights – justice – discrimination – hate – equality
It’s been going on for decades now. But we must demand that our political leaders call out the illegitimacy of embedding undefined radical terms in our laws. And we must continue to make that clear, too!
As we pointed out above, we can’t simply wait until a new transgender edict begins to destroy girls’ and women’s sports. The deeper roots of that agenda need to be confronted now. Are conservatives up for that? More to the point: Do we have a choice?
Amy Contrada is with MassResistance. Early in the transgender rights onslaught (2008), she published a groundbreaking analysis of the Massachusetts transgender rights bill.
Please help us continue to do our uncompromising work!
Our successes depend on people like you.
Q&A:I’m From New Jersey And I Visit Your Site From Time To Time But I Have Been Blocked From Accessing The Site Why Am I Not Able To Access Your Site?
The Homosexual Deviant Plan For The Widespread Sexual Brainwashing And Indoctrination Of Children In Schools Ramps Up:California Votes To Overhaul Sex Ed Guidelines For Public Schools To Include LGBT Issues.
In Light Of The Current Spate Of Violent Attacks Against The Homosexual,Lesbian And Transgender Community Do You Think You Could Be Partially Responsible For At Least Some Of It Because Of The Information You Put Out?