The Truth Plain An Simple– St John 5:28-29, Romans 2:6-10
News From A Biblical Perspective -Ordained, Predestined, Called And Justified, By God, Not By Man! – Jeremiah 1:15, Romans 8:29-31, Ephesians 1:5, Ephesians 1:11
Share

Image result for you tube

By Erika Haas

 

YouTube rolls out big changes in response to  the Las Vegas shooting.

 

In the wake of the Las Vegas shooing, YouTube has banned all videos demonstrating how to modify firearms so that they can fire in more rapid succession.
 

More specifically, the site has taken down all content explaining how to install “bump stocks,” the device used by the Vegas shooter when he opened fire on a crowd of Route 91 Festival-goers, leaving 58 dead and over 500 more injured.

 

“We have long had a policy against harmful and dangerous content,” a spokesman for YouTube said, reports The Telegraph. “In the wake of the recent tragedy in Las Vegas, we have taken a closer look at videos that demonstrate how to convert firearms to make them fire more quickly and we’ve expanded our existing policy to prohibit these videos.”

 

The policy change is likely more of a strategic business move than a real effort to combat violence.

 

Back in March, the Google-owned site lost millions when a number of major advertisers, including AT&T, Verizon, Pepsi, Walmart and Johnson & Johnson, pulled their ads after they reportedly appeared along side videos promoting hate, violence and even terrorism.

 

You can imagine a similar uproar right now if a company’s ad popped up next to a video on how to modify your firearm in the same way the Vegas shooter modified his.

 

Prohibiting gun modification videos isn’t the only change YouTube has made in the aftermath of the shooting. The site was forced to alter its search algorithm after users complained that the top results for the attack were videos promoting conspiracy theories.

 

The Wall Street Journal reports that the fifth result when searching “Las Vegas shooting” last Tuesday was a video titled “Proof Las Vegas Shooting Was a FALSE FLAG attack—Shooter on 4th Floor,” posted by a channel called End Times News Report.

 

While YouTube removed the video the following day, Jake Morphonios, who runs the channel, told the Wall Street Journal the post ended up gaining 2.5 million views as a result of being bumped to the first page.

 

YouTube reportedly knew its algorithm was flawed, and has been working on these changes for months. While there’s still a lot of work to be done, the site decided to roll out the changes early after receiving widespread criticism in the wake of the shooting.

 

What do you think of these changes? Is YouTube doing too much or not enough?

Share

Tags:
Share

Share

Share

 

 

I have been writing for quite sometime about how the radical left in cahoots with the liberal mainstream media are working to undermine and destroy freedom of speech.And  it appears that objective has never been more obvious than it is now. Their goal has never been tolerance,a  group which is primarily comprised of sexual deviants in powerful positions, as well as sexual deviants in more common everyday white collar and blue roles.Who are behind the push to destroy free speech,by promoting chaos and anarchy as means to silence  all differing views and opinions.

 

They simply want to silence anyone who has differing views or opposes their twisted and very destructive agenda.Which includes the promotion of transgenderism, the legalization of pedophilia, as well as  furthering and continuing to spread and popularize filthy,corrupting  and destructive homosexual behavior.

 

As well as the legalization and promotion of any form of twisted sexual behavior as long as the person who practices it, fights for it and promotes it, feels it’s right in their minds.No matter how twisted,vile, filthy,infectious and toxic it is, on a physical and spiritual level.

 

Conservative writer and best selling author Ann Coulter was recently snubbed by the University Of Berkeley California and prevented from speaking there because of her conservative views.And although I don’t agree with everything Ann says I am in agreement with her stance on certain issues.And preventing Ann from speaking at that University is a classic example of liberal fascism.

 

The left is now using the ridiculous argument that hate speech, as they define it, can’t be viewed or accepted as free speech. Which really boils down to the fact that anything that opposes their twisted destructive views and ideologies, they have the right to label “hate speech” and therefore challenge it’s veracity,in terms of what should fall under the category of “free speech”. They seek to redefine “free speech” as anything that fits the liberal definition and viewpoint.

 

But all speech even if it’s contrary to your own views is free speech based on the constitution. So where does that leave us? Certainly not bowing down to the left. To do that would simply be tantamount to handing over the reigns of power to insane, perverted sex addicts, who’s sex addictions for the most part guide and form their goals and agenda.

 

The real powers behind the funding of the movement are primarily comprised of perverted sex addicts,who hopefully seek to realize an open and free, perverted sex driven society, where anything goes.Many of these individuals are Aleister Crowley disciples,who live by and follow the Crowley doctrine,which is “do as thou wilt”.

 

A philosophy that promotes a lifestyle that believes there should be no sexual boundaries that constrain men and women. Which is really satanic in nature and the true definition and origins of anarchy and chaos. Because laws which govern against immorality or criminality are meant to prevent and avert chaos.A society where unrestrained  perverted sex  is allowed to flourish unchecked, is equally as destructive and dangerous as a society where unrestrained criminality is allowed to flourish unchecked. Without laws whether moral or criminal  you have a lawless society which leads to anarchy and chaos.

 

Which is certainly what Satan seeks to promote through the radical left,and it’s warped and twisted ideas and philosophy, because of how physically and spiritually corrupting and destructive, that way of thinking and behaving really is.And by the way, Saul Alinsky’s rules for radicals fits right into their diabolical plans,because it limits the rights of and strips power from the citizens which ultimately makes what they’re trying to accomplish that much easier.

 

And of course Satan’s goal is to destroy as many physical and spiritual lives as he can before he is tormented for all eternity. The radical left is not just a dangerous movement, but it’s a Satan inspired movement with the twisted diabolical teachings and  doctrine  of Aleister Crowley as the subversive and covert foundation that many really powerful and wealthy radical liberals themselves live by in many respects.

 

So to bend to the will of the radical left is essentially like putting Satan himself in the drivers seat, while we rational thinkers simply go along for the ride. There is a more sinister and diabolical spiritual force behind the fight to destroy free speech.And to bow down to that radical liberal agenda is tantamount to giving Satan the steering wheel while we just quietly go along for the ride. Do I really need to tell you how that is going to turn out? And do you really  think giving in and laying down to such a destructive and corrupting movement is an option?

 

These riots are just that riots and unlawful descent, and that descent needs to be quelled by using lawful means, and any professor or any member of the Universities faculty who encourages this kind of lawless behavior needs to be held accountable as well.

 

The promotion of an open and free,perverted,sex driven society, is hidden as the  core foundation of the movement, with the further promotion of homosexuality,bisexuality, lesbianism, transgenderism,and pedophilia as the goals. Although they will try to cloak it as some other movement,or use multiple arguments for differing social issues as the fake foundation of the movement.

 

Much like how the homosexual movement hijacked many chapters of the black lives matter movement. And how they had always been behind the scenes funding specific chapters of  the movement, with the real goal of eventually taking over the movement and furthering the homosexual agenda.The same thing applies in this case but only on a much broader scale.They are the primary group behind the descent. With many wealthy homosexuals,bisexuals and lesbians behind the scenes funding the movement, while using other social issues and groups as a front, as they work covertly to realize their sick goals and agenda.

 

An open and free, perverted, sex  driven society, and the practicing and promotion of black magic and sorcery are just some of  the goals. It will lead to chaos,anarchy, disease,death, destruction, sorrow and suffering, but yet Satan has convinced these blind perverted sex addicts that it will in fact be good for society. But in reality it will lead to death, confusion,sorrow and suffering, on an unimaginable scale. And the radical liberal left and it’s exploits, with all the violence and chaos  you see is just the beginning if its allowed to persist unopposed.And in actuality is the world Aleister Crowley envisioned (as he was powerfully deceived and influenced by Satan) in it’s beginning stages, and in embryo.

 

 

Related  Information

Who Is Really Behind The Rise Of The Black Lives Matter Movement

 

Was Darren King Killed because He Exposed The Black Lives Matter Movement As A Homosexual Organization.

Share

Share

Share

Tags: ,
Share

Share

Tags:
Share

Image result for Congress

 

 

 

If there is no freedom of speech, then there is no United States of America. It’s foundational to our liberty. Free speech isn’t always speech we like, but it’s necessary none the less.

 

Well, it seems as though the federal government wants to segregate speech into acceptable and unacceptable categories. According to Eugene Volokh at The Washington Post, the House of Representatives passed the Consumer Review Fairness Act, which deals with form contracts between customers and businesses. But in the murk of legalese and jargon, a clause leaps to the forefront which sends a truckload of red flags, as Volokh notes:

 

The law “shall not apply to the extent that a provision of a form contract prohibits . . . submission of,” among other things, material that “contains the personal information or likeness of another person, or is libelous, harassing, abusive, obscene, vulgar, sexually explicit, or is inappropriate with respect to race, gender, sexuality, ethnicity, or other intrinsic characteristic.”

 

So speech on all sorts of viewpoints would be protected by the proposed law, even against private contractual restrictions. A business couldn’t require users to agree to a contract that forbids critical reviews. A fur store couldn’t do the same as to anti-fur reviews; a restaurant couldn’t do the same to reviews that faulted it for serving foie gras. A business whose owner was pro-Donald Trump, and who was afraid that clients would learn this and would then publicly excoriate him for it, couldn’t do the same as to anti-Trump reviews. But contracts barring speech that “is inappropriate” (whatever that is) “with respect to race, gender, sexuality, ethnicity, or other intrinsic characteristic” would remain perfectly legal.

 

That’s called unconstitutional. This is planting a seed of speech policing that could grow to allow federal lawmakers to decide what is appropriate speech and what is inappropriate speech. May it never be!

For those who’ve forgotten, let’s take another look at the Constitution’s First Amendment. “Congress shall make no law…” Stop right there. That’s as clear as a bell. Continue:

 

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

 

Yet, it appears they are making a law that blurs the lines. It may be a first step and a very small one at that, but those steps will get larger, and our rights will erode faster unless we do something to call back that power. That’s why an Article V Convention of States is now more important than ever.orking To Abolish 

Share

Tags:
Share

The unprecedented campaign against free speech

By Mark Holden

 

The liberal Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes once warned of the biggest danger facing free speech: “If you have no doubt of your premises or your power, and want a certain result with all your heart, you naturally express your wishes in law, and sweep away all opposition.”
Yet many lawmakers today are mistaking his wise warning as an invitation to restrict the First Amendment. At nearly every level of government, freedom of speech is under unprecedented attack. Many on the political left now seek to silence their opponents and reorder society in accordance with their personal beliefs. This is in many ways the single greatest threat to America’s experiment in self-governance.
This coordinated campaign has been underway for years. Its creation can be traced to the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, when the court refused to accept the Obama administration’s argument that it could ban books, mailers, advertisements or anything else that contained a political message during an election campaign. This simple ruling ensured that Americans retained the fundamental right to use free speech to praise or criticize a candidate running for office.

 

However, that is the very core of free speech itself. If Americans — individually or acting together through nonprofits, businesses or labor unions — cannot voice their views on public policy and elected officials, then the democratic process as we know it is dead. The result is a system that makes those already in power even more powerful; incumbents need not fear having those pesky voters learn about their statements, views and voting records.

 

In fact, liberal politicians and activists swiftly made opposition to Citizens United a defining part of their platform from the moment the Supreme Court issued its decision. By 2014, no fewer than 54 U.S. Senators — all Democrats or Democratic allies such as current presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders (Vt.) — supported a constitutional amendment essentially rewriting the First Amendment so that the federal government could regulate and criminalize free speech. Congressional Democrats are once again preparing to make a push to roll back the court’s decision and stifle free speech.

 

Not to be outdone, leading Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has declared that she would only appoint judges who promise to overturn Citizens United and permit the censorship of political speech.

At the same time, lawmakers and their allies have found other ways to stifle their opponents’ speech. Americans learned in 2013 that the IRS had systematically singled out conservative nonprofits in the build-up to the 2012 election. The agency harassed many applicants and kneecapped others by refusing to grant them tax-exempt status, restricting their members and supporters from exercising their rights to free speech and free association.

 

Sadly, this abuse of power still occurs. The federal courts recently learned that multiple nonprofits still haven’t received IRS approval.

Even more attacks on free speech are happening at the state level. For example, New York and California are both demanding that some nonprofits hand over lists of donors to the state. Although the government invariably promises to not release this legally confidential information, California has “accidentally” posted at least 1,400 supporter lists online.

 

This fact, and ongoing harassment by California Attorney General Kamala Harris, led a federal judge to permanently stop her from obtaining the donor list of one organization, the Americans for Prosperity Foundation. (Full disclosure: I am a director of the related Americans for Prosperity.) However, the IRS has done something similar, conveniently disclosing confidential taxpayer information for several of the Obama administration’s political opponents.

 

And then there are the demands that government investigate organizations that hold unpopular or controversial views. Over a dozen state attorneys general (all of them Democrats), recently announced that they will go after companies such as Exxon Mobil that disagree with their views on climate change. The prosecutors’ goal is to intimidate these groups to change their position or else face criminal prosecution.

 

Federal lawmakers are in on the action, too. The Department of Justice has asked the FBI to begin similar investigations of major energy companies. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) has even called for organizations that disagree with him to be prosecuted under the federal law banning racketeering — a law originally meant to target mobsters and drug kingpins.

 

This coordinated campaign is antithetical to the First Amendment’s guarantee of free speech. In our system of self-government, when someone finds other people’s ideas and opinions disagreeable or even reprehensible, the solution is more speech, not less. Yet instead of persuading others to see their point of view, many in today’s society would rather use government’s power to bully their opponents into silence instead.

 

Thankfully, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) have tried to combat this assault on free speech. They have championed a number of reforms to protect the First Amendment and prevent elected officials and the administrative state from stifling Americans’ right to free speech.

 

Their leadership should be praised, but much more needs to be done. This fundamental right won’t truly be protected until Americans of all political persuasions heed Justice Holmes’s wise words.

Holden is senior vice president and general counsel of Koch Industries, Inc. and a director of Americans for Prosperity. (The chairman of the Americans for Prosperity Foundation, David Koch, is also executive vice president and director of Koch Industries.)

Share

Tags:

Powered by Wordpress
Theme © 2005 - 2009 FrederikM.de
BlueMod is a modification of the blueblog_DE Theme by Oliver Wunder
Translate »