The Truth Plain An Simple– St John 5:28-29, Romans 2:6-10
News From A Biblical Perspective -Ordained, Predestined, Called And Justified, By God, Not By Man! – Jeremiah 1:15, Romans 8:29-31, Ephesians 1:5, Ephesians 1:11
Share

Climate change is an area where liberals have made it abundantly clear that they are both lost and uninterested in learning about how lost they are.

They are constantly wrong about the data while also constantly dishonest about the consensus about the data.

 

The media went nuts when President Trump announced he would try to inject some sanity into the conversation by pulling out of the disastrous Paris Climate Agreement.  Trump stuck to his guns and went with the belief that we should focus on the American economy before anyone else’s.

 

A new report suggests that Trump’s move was absolutely the correct one because once again it looks like global warming data is taking a huge hit.

According to the report, which has been peer reviewed by administrators, scientists and researchers from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.), and several of America’s leading universities, the data is completely bunk:

 

In this research report, the most important surface data adjustment issues are identified and past changes in the previously reported historical data are quantified. It was found that each new version of GAST has nearly always exhibited a steeper warming linear trend over its entire history. And, it was nearly always accomplished by systematically removing the previously existing cyclical temperature pattern. This was true for all three entities providing GAST data measurement, NOAA, NASA and Hadley CRU.

 

As a result, this research sought to validate the current estimates of GAST using the best available relevant data. This included the best documented and understood data sets from the U.S. and elsewhere as well as global data from satellites that provide far more extensive global coverage and are not contaminated by bad siting and urbanization impacts. Satellite data integrity also benefits from having cross checks with Balloon data.

 

The conclusive findings of this research are that the three GAST data sets are not a valid representation of reality. In fact, the magnitude of their historical data adjustments, that removed their cyclical temperature patterns, are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data. Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published GAST data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever –despite current claims of record setting warming.

 

Finally, since GAST data set validity is a necessary condition for EPA’s GHG/CO2 Endangerment Finding, it too is invalidated by these research findings.

 

Bottom line?

The science is far from settled on what’s going on with our climate and how much we contribute.

 

That means that entering a nonbinding agreement that kills jobs in America isn’t a great or necessary idea.

 

It also means that the liberal agenda on climate change in America isn’t as scientifically sound as they claim.

 

However, there’s nothing that will change their mind on this issue. It’s about rabid ideology. Not facts. 

 

 

 

Related Information

How To Distinguish The Wrath Of God, From The Wrath Of Satan

 

 

 

Listen: Climate Change Or The Wrath Of God?

Climate Change Or The Wrath Of God?

 

 

 

 

Is There A More Diabolical Motive Behind The Global Warming Scare?

 

 

 

Mathematical Proof That Man-Made Climate Change Is A Total Hoax.

 

Climate change (global warming)

 

 

Hoax or Fact? Man-Made Climate Change

Climate change: This Is The Worst Scientific Scandal Of Our Generation

 

Climate Change

 

9 Things You Need To Know About The Climate Change Hoax

 

Man Made Climate Change Hype

  

Debunking The Top Five Man Made Climate Change Myths

 

 

John Coleman Founder Of The Weather Channel Exposes Man Made Climate Change As a Hoax. 

 

Lord Christopher Monckton Ends The Global Warming Debate And Proves Its A Hoax

 

 The Continued,Repetitive,Debunking Of The Man Climate Change Hoax/Fraud.

 

The Founder Of The Weather Channel Continues To Debunk The Man Made Climate Change Fraud.

 

The Science Behind Global Warming Hysteria.

 

The Man Made Climate Change Deception.

 

Is Man Made Climate Change Now Indisputable?

 

The Great Global Warming Swindle.

 

 

Related articles:

Australia Reining in Climate Schemes After Voters Reject Carbon Tax

Top Scientists Slam and Ridicule UN IPCC Climate Report

UN Carbon Regime Would Devastate Humanity

Australia Votes to Crush Carbon Tax and Big Government

Arctic Ice Expands, Dispelling Myths of Climate Change

Australia’s Carbon Tax Contributing to Record Business Failures

Carbon Tax Bad for Australian Hospitals’ Health

Climate Theories Crumble as Data and Experts Suggest Global Cooling

Poll: Australian “Carbon Tax” Wildly Unpopular

“Climate Science” in Shambles: Real Scientists Battle UN Agenda

Global-warming Alarmism Dying a Slow Death

Despite Lack of Global Warming, UN Sure Humanity Is to Blame

Obama & Allies Tell UN to Cover for Lack of Global Warming

Amid UN Climate Deception, Experts Decry Corruption of Science

Obama EPA Climate Decrees Will Further Damage U.S. Economy

The Real Agenda Behind UN “Sustainability” Unmasked

IPCC Researchers Admit Global Warming Fraud

 

 

Share

Share

Why I Stopped Believing in Man-made Global Warming and Became a Climate Skeptic.

protest_climateWhen I was in my late 20s, I was living in San Francisco and playing in a reggae band. At the time, I fervently believed that global warming was a real, man-made problem. And I was vocal about it. Among other things, my friends and I would slap bumper stickers on SUVs that said: “I’m Changing The Climate, Ask Me How.” I didn’t like yuppies, and I resented their big SUVs struggling to climb the city’s steep hills, needlessly warming our planet.

It seemed obvious to me that there was a climate change problem. I heard about it—and read about it—every day in the news. Eventually, I started to study the issue, thinking that I needed to understand it better to write informed articles on the subject.

 

The first time I experienced a twinge of climate change doubt was when I learned that carbon dioxide (CO2) comprised less than 0.04 percent of the atmosphere. In truth, such a seemingly small amount shouldn’t be underestimated since CO2 starts trapping heat quite effectively at far more minuscule concentrations. But at the time, I thought, “That’s strange. I would have thought it was a lot more.”

 

The point is I had been barraged with so much global warming hysteria that I figured CO2 must comprise one percent or five percent or 10 percent of the atmosphere. But since it was only 0.04 percent, it seemed to me that the people making the case for global warming should be more careful, and not exaggerate their claims—to not lose credibility.

 

Regardless, I continued to believe that man was changing the climate. And I was unhappy with friends who seemed like stubborn, cranky holdouts when they disputed this indisputable fact—that humankind was indeed warming the planet.

 

The years rolled along and I still assumed global warming was a man-made catastrophe—until I finally started to study the science of the issue. At that point, two minor pieces of information helped to trigger a real curiosity for me—and led me to realize that the issue was far more complicated than I had always believed.

 

The first was learning that man produces only a tiny portion of all CO2 released into the atmosphere each year. In contrast, for example, termites alone release far more CO2 annually (and by several orders of magnitude) than all the burning of fossil fuels. The second was learning that there had been a global cooling scare in the 1970s.

 

After stumbling across these two seemingly random nuggets of information, I started to really read—and with an open mind. And it was then that I began to profoundly change my opinion. Simply put, I went from wholeheartedly believing in man-made “climate change” to viewing the science undergirding the case as very questionable. Overall, I became resentful that I’d been naively indoctrinated by a daily, one-sided media barrage. And I started to look at myself as something of a freedom fighter—someone who was pushing back against misinformation—and making people aware that they were being manipulated.

 

If asked why I don’t believe in the theory of “anthropogenic” (man-made) warming, I try to list some very simple points. I explain that, yes, the Earth has warmed by roughly 0.8 degrees Celsius over the past 150 years—and I agree that surface temperatures have warmed, that the oceans have warmed, and that glaciers have retreated. But I disagree with the root cause of this warming.

 

For starters, CO2 is actually a rather flawed “greenhouse gas.” When CO2 is first introduced into the atmosphere it rapidly absorbs as much heat (in the form of infrared radiation) as possible. But it doesn’t take long for CO2 to become “optically saturated.” This means that after reaching roughly 0.0020 percent (20 parts per million) of the atmosphere, CO2 starts fading. From then on, it takes ever-doubling amounts of CO2 to trap the same amount of heat. By the present concentration of 0.04 percent (400 parts per million), CO2 is essentially saturated—and can’t meaningfully trap much additional heat.

 

This limitation of CO2 actually runs completely counter to the prevailing notion that adding more CO2 to the atmosphere will continue to trap ever greater amounts of heat. In truth, basic science demonstrates exactly the opposite, which is why climate scientists actually base most of their projected warming on “positive feedback” from water vapor.

 

Significantly, water vapor functions as the predominant heat-trapping gas in the atmosphere. And so, when climate scientists use computer models to predict future warming due to man-made climate change, they are essentially saying the following: We know that CO2 rapidly fades as a greenhouse gas. We think that before CO2 becomes saturated, it will raise global temperatures enough to add more water vapor to the atmosphere. This added water vapor will trap more heat, which will raise temperatures more, which will add more water vapor. The result will be a feedback loop that keeps driving a rise in temperatures.

 

There’s a major flaw in this theory, however, and one that climate scientists have never been able to solve. Simply put, water vapor in the atmosphere inevitably transitions to clouds. And cumulus clouds not only reflect solar radiation back into space but also produce rain—which not only lowers surface temperatures but also scrubs CO2 from the atmosphere.

 

Regardless of the cloud problem, this presumed climate “sensitivity” to CO2 is the overall engine of man-made warming and continues to be programmed into computer models. But it remains a tenuous argument. So the real question should be: Well if CO2 isn’t driving global warming, what is?

And that brings us to the second point that I try to make—the issue of solar variability. Over the past 150 years, the sun’s output has increased quite significantly—to levels not seen in as much as 2,000 years. Many people assume that the sun’s output is constant, but in fact, it ebbs and flows on various short- and long-term cycles. And so, not only did solar activity increase sharply during the 20th century, but this same increase in output corresponds quite closely with other warm periods recorded over the past few thousands of years.

 

Sadly, advocates of man-made climate change essentially discount solar activity as a meaningful contributor to global warming. Their reasoning is that changes in solar irradiance (“brightness”) are quite small compared to the overall, observed warming of the 20th century. However, this view overlooks the related—and larger—impacts of solar variability, including atmospheric ionization and cloud formation. And so, when considered together, these associated factors demonstrate a more complete picture of solar variability’s relevance.

 

Compounding the impact of increased solar activity in the 20th century is the issue of ozone depletion. From the late 1950s until the mid-1990s, ozone concentrations in the stratosphere steadily diminished. As ozone levels declined, the amount of ultraviolet radiation (UV) reaching the Earth’s surface steadily increased. UV radiation is the primary source of atmospheric warmth, which helps to explain why increased UV penetration during the latter portion of the 20th century contributed to a rise in temperatures. Notably, the ozone layer began to stabilize after 1996, when the Montreal Protocol (which banned chlorofluorocarbons) was fully implemented. In fact, since the late 1990s, both satellite data and weather balloon measurements show a net flatlining of global temperatures.

 

This “pause” in the rise of global temperatures since the late 1990s has become the focus of serious debate within the climate community. Simply put, the theory of man-made warming cannot account for a halt in the overall rise in temperatures, or why computer models (programmed to emphasize a high climate sensitivity to CO2) are continuing to diverge from actual, observed temperature measurements.

 

The flatlining of net temperatures observed by satellites is also at odds with recent adjustments to surface measurements issued by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and adopted by NASA. By revising its temperature collection methods to include measurements taken from the engine manifolds of oceangoing vessels, and by estimating Arctic Ocean readings based on neighboring land masses, NOAA was able to announce in 2015 that there has been no “pause” in temperatures and that recent years are the “warmest on record.” The fact that NOAA’s findings continue to conflict with satellite readings has not received much attention.

 

What’s really interesting to study about climate change is the pattern of warming and cooling seen over the last few thousand years of the current interglacial period. It’s somewhat ironic that claims of a “warmest year on record” only include the “modern” instrumental era of 1880 to the present. But studying 100 or 150 years yields only a partial glimpse of recent temperature trends. If one actually looks back over the past 2,000 years, for example, a far more complete—and complex—landscape emerges.

 

Thanks to proxy measurements of carbon, beryllium, and oxygen isotopes, geologists can estimate both temperatures and solar activity going back many thousands of years. And so, we know that from roughly 250-400 AD, the global climate was warmer than today, in what was called the “Roman Warm Period.” Solar output at the time was high, which helps to explain the temperate conditions that aided the expansion of the Roman Empire. However, solar activity plummeted during the middle of the first millennium, leading to several centuries of brutal cold during the Dark Ages, culminating in the Nile River actually freezing in 829 AD.

 

One hundred years after the Nile River froze, however, solar activity started climbing back toward more comfortable levels, leading to a “Medieval Warm Period” that spanned roughly 950-1250 AD. Historical and geologic records indicate that, globally, the Medieval Warm Period was warmer than today, with balmy weather allowing the Vikings to farm on Greenland (hence its name), and the British to raise vineyards and produce wine.

 

From 1350-1850, though, solar activity plummeted several times, leading to a colder era nicknamed the “Little Ice Age.” Millions of people died of famine and disease during this inhospitable time, and it was only with the rebound of solar activity in the latter part of the 1800s that temperatures climbed back to a more comfortable climate.

 

And now we’re in the “Modern Warm Period,” the latest in a succession of warm/cold episodes that track closely with solar variability. Something to consider when reviewing these alternating periods of climate is that it is during warm phases that civilizations flourish. While millions of people starved during the Dark Ages and the Little Ice Age, global agriculture thrived during the Medieval Warm Period.

 

Overall, and as noted above, there are valid reasons to conclude that CO2 is not the primary forcing agent of global climate. Thus, it’s unfortunate that the media often ridicules climate critics rather than spend more time investigating their views. Clearly, there’s a media bias involved, and one that reinforces notions such as “the science is settled,” or that “97 percent of scientists agree.”

 

However, the idea of an overwhelming consensus on global warming not only conflicts with the more than 30,000 scientists who have signed the “Petition Project” rejecting man-made warming but relies on spurious assumptions. The 97 percent figure stems from a May 2013 Tweet by President Obama stating that “97 percent of scientists agree: climate change is real, man-made, and dangerous.” As his source, the president linked to a newly published study by John Cook at the University of Queensland. However, a closer look at Cook’s study reveals that of the 11,994 research papers examined, only one-third actually took a position regarding the causes of global warming.

 

There are various instances of this exaggeration and hype in the climate change debate. But nothing could be as troubling as the prescriptions currently being formulated by climate alarmists. In the service of preventing a future catastrophe based solely on flawed computer modeling, public figures are calling for an 80 percent (or even 100 percent) ban on the future use of fossil fuels. While seemingly well-intentioned, these policies overlook two real-world problems.

 

First, a mass reduction in fossil fuel use would forfeit the lives of hundreds of millions of people in developing nations. Currently limited to the barest of medical aid and technical infrastructure, these populations already exist at a poverty line, barely supported by sporadic power generation. It is only through the introduction of water and sewage treatment (powered by natural gas and coal plants) that some areas of the Third World are attempting to raise living standards.

 

Second, a presumed switch to wind and solar generation overlooks the glaring deficiencies of both forms of power: Wind and solar are inherently intermittent means of electricity production (because the wind doesn’t always blow and the sun doesn’t always shine). And both are also low-yield and expensive—in part because their unreliability still requires ample backup generation from “spinning reserves” of either natural gas or coal.

 

If the United States were to actually make the transition to a partially or fully wind- and solar-based power infrastructure, the failures of Europe and Australia’s green energy experiments show that the nation would experience an ongoing series of power shortages and blackouts. The result would be a consequential loss of health and safety measures. Hospitals would fight to prioritize available power. Water treatment and waste systems could fail. Foods would spoil due to lack of refrigeration.

 

The overall point is that there are valid reasons to question both the assumptions and policies advocated by climate change activists. It would be helpful if those who take a stand against presumed man-made warming were given a chance to expand on their reasoning, rather than face criticism and scorn. And so, at a time of political uncertainty and economic difficulty, it would make sense to fully study all the potential ramifications of such a complicated issue.

 

Article Source

Share

Tags:
Share

9 Things You Need To Know About The Climate Change Hoax.

 

BY: AARON BANDLER–OCTOBER 7, 2016

 

With Hurricane Matthew wreaking havoc, the Left is predictably seizing the storm as a means of promoting their radical global warming agenda. Climate change has not been a major theme this election cycle, but Hillary Clinton is now trying to turn it into one, with the help of global warming guru Al Gore. Unfortunately for the climate change alarmists, despite all the celebrity endorsements and high-minded rhetoric, the facts keep getting in the way. Here are nine things you need to know about the climate change hoax.

 

1. The Climategate scandal proved that key data involving man-made climate change was manipulated. In 2009, the public discovered emails from the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit exposing how scientists who have been enormously influential in promoting the concept of man-made climate change actually attempted to cook the books to obtain results that served their narrative that the planet was heating at a dangerous trend due to higher levels of carbon dioxide.

 

One of these scientists included Dr. James Hansen, a former NASA climatologist who is known by some as the “father” or “grandfather” of the climate change myth, as it was his “Model Zero” that first introduced the concept of global warming. Hansen, Philip Jones, Michael Mann, et al. were all involved in trying “to lower past temperatures and to ‘adjust’ recent temperatures upwards, in order to convey the impression of an accelerated warming,” according to the leaked emails. The emails also revealed how this cabal of scientists would discuss various ways to stonewall the public from seeing the “background data on which their findings and temperature records were based,” even going as far as deleting significant amounts of data. They would engage in efforts to smear “any scientific journal which dares to publish their critics’ work.”

 

2. The Climategate scandal was given new life in 2011, with the release of new emails. The new round of leaked emails at the time provided more teeth to the revelations of 2009. Here are a couple of egregious emails from Jones found, via Forbes:

“I’ve been told that IPCC is above national FOI [Freedom of Information] Acts. One way to cover yourself and all those working in AR5 would be to delete all emails at the end of the process,” writes Phil Jones, a scientist working with the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), in a newly released email.

“Any work we have done in the past is done on the back of the research grants we get – and has to be well hidden,” Jones writes in another newly released email. “I’ve discussed this with the main funder (U.S. Dept of Energy) in the past and they are happy about not releasing the original station data.”

An email written by Mann showed that he tried to get “an investigative journalist to investigate and expose” a climate skeptic scientist named Steven McIntyre.

 

 

3. NASA may have also been involved in manipulating data to serve the narrative of man-made climate change. The Washington Times reported in 2009: “Under pressure in 2007, NASA recalculated its data and found that 1934, not 1998, was the hottest year in its records for the contiguous 48 states. NASA later changed that data again, and now 1998 and 2006 are tied for first, with 1934 slightly cooler.”

Since this occurred at around the same time as the Climategate scandal, Chris Horner of the Competitive Enterprise Institute filed a lawsuit to get NASA to release their relevant data sets on this issue and was able to expose emails from NASA that revealed a disturbing fact: the agency admitted “that its own climate findings were inferior to those maintained by both the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit,” reported Fox News in 2010 – meaning NASA climate change data sets were less accurate than the organization embattled with manipulating data sets.

 

 

A 2015 Washington Times editorial also highlighted another example of NASA cooking the books:

Paul Homewood, a skeptical researcher, found that in Paraguay, temperature readings for the 20th century at all nine weather stations supervised by NASA had been “adjusted” to transform a cooling trend into a warming trend. His analysis of readings in the Arctic found that rapid warming between 1920 and 1950 — before human activity could have increased the production of greenhouse gases — were adjusted downward so that the 1980s and ‘90s temperatures would stand out as warmer.

 

4. NASA also declared 2014 to be the hottest year on record – despite the fact that they were only 38 percent sure about it. The latter fact was left out of their press release at the time, as well as the fact that 2014 was supposedly hotter than the previous hottest year, 2010, by 0.02C – well within the margin of error of 0.1C that scientists tend to adhere by. The Washington Post attempted to spin in favor of NASA by arguing that NASA simply said that 2014 was the most likely hottest year on record – but their press release unequivocally stated that “2014 was the warmest year on record” and leaving out the aforementioned key facts makes such a declaration seem misleading, as it’s clearly not a guarantee that 2014 was even likely the hottest year on record.

 

5. There is no evidence that the Earth has been warming in recent years. As The Daily Caller highlights, a recent peer-reviewed study concluded that when accounting for El Ninos and La Ninas – which are the “the fluctuations in temperature between the ocean and atmosphere in the east-central Equatorial Pacific” that “occur on average every two to seven years,” according to NOAA – there has been a flat-line temperature trend since 1997. In fact, the study found that the El Ninos and La Ninas disproved the existence of the Tropical Hot Spot, which the Environmental Protection Agency claimed as evidence of carbon dioxide supposedly warming the atmosphere.

 

 

6. The left likes to claim that 97 percent of scientists support the concept of man-made climate change. It’s likely closer to 43 percent. The 97 percent myth stems from a variety of flawed studies, as the Daily Wire explained here. On the other hand, the PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency conducted a survey in 2015 that found that only 43 percent of scientists believe in man-made climate change, which is far from a consensus.

 

7. The amount of Arctic sea ice has become quite high. Data from the Danish Meteorological Institute shows that the “average [ice] extent over the month [of September] is one of the highest in the last decade,” according to Paul Homewood. This runs directly counter to the predictions of the climate change models.

 

8. Money from the federal government and leftist organizations fuel a lot of misinformation from man-made global warming alarmists.  Climate change alarmism is an extremely lucrative industry. All in all, there have been over $32.5 billion of federal government grants that have funded climate change research from 1989-2009, far more than any research funded by the oil industry. National Review reports:

Last summer, a minority staff report from the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works gave details on a “Billionaire’s Club” — a shadowy network of charitable foundations that distribute billions to advance climate alarmism. Shadowy nonprofits such as the Energy Foundation and Tides Foundation distributed billions to far-left green groups such as the Natural Resources Defense Council, which in turn send staff to the EPA who then direct federal grants back to the same green groups. It is incestuous. It is opaque. Major media ignored the report.

 

Mann, one of the scientists mentioned earlier for his role in the Climategate scandal, received nearly $6 million in grants from the federal government. The sources of funding for scientists like Hansen are unknown, the federal government has been resisting Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests to reveal them.

 

9. It is patently absurd to link Hurricane Matthew to climate change. Not just because of the aforementioned reasons, but because as Marco Morano points out at Climate Depot, “The data show for the last 10 years we have had an unusual drought of landfalling major hurricanes (Category 3 and higher) on the continental U.S.”

“That’s right, no major hurricanes have made landfall for over a decade,” Morano continued. “This is the longest such drought on record.”

For more on the issue of climate change, read the Daily Wire‘s piece here.

Share

Tags:
Share

Mathematical Proof That Man-Made Climate Change Is A Total Hoax.

 

Image: Mathematical proof that man-made climate change is a total hoax

 

 

Article Source: http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-01-14-mathematical-proof-that-man-made-climate-change-is-a-total-hoax.html#

 

 

(Natural News) One of the grandest scientific hoaxes ever perpetrated against humankind is that Man’s modern life (along with cattle farts) is causing catastrophic “climate change”—or “global warming,” depending on the day.

 

There has been a plethora of evidence to prove the whole thing is a hoax, for anyone willing to actually see it and accept it. This has ranged from faking warming data, to pretending that climate change is “settled science,” to hiding the real motives behind the hoax. In fact, hoaxers have even changed the entire narrative; once upon a time it wasn’t global warming that was going to destroy all life, it was global cooling.

 

Now, there is even mathematical evidence proving the great climate lie. Infowars reporter Millie Weaver recently interviewed Lord Christopher Monckton, 3rd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley, a conservative British politician and inventor of mathematical puzzle “Eternity,” who said there is a breaking discovery that will prove the entire climate change scare is based on faulty mathematics. This seems logical, given that the vast majority of claims that the earth is warming and that modern industry is the cause are primarily based on incorrect computer models.

 

At a conference in Phoenix called, “Global Warming: An Inconvenient Lie,” Monckton discussed in depth a mathematical discovery made by he and his team and that their findings have since been submitted for the proper academic peer review. (RELATED: Follow the real science about climate change at ClimateScienceNews.com)

 

‘I knew there was an error’

The team of international scientists has “discovered a major, significant, substantial error in the way in which the computer models calculate how much warming they would predict should be happening.” He said if the error is taken away, “there is no longer any climate problem.” And while there will indeed be “one or two Celsius of warming” and a doubling of CO2 concentration “but you won’t get much more than that.”

 

The notion being pushed by Left-wing control freaks in global government that our planet is warming at an alarming, unstoppable rate, is completely bogus, and it always has been. Monckton and his team have demonstrated it mathematically, and no matter how many more times alarmist hoaxer Al Gore claims all of the ice caps are going to disappear “soon,” it just isn’t true. (But the sheeple will believe almost anything. Follow more sheeple news at Sheeple.news)

 

 

Monckton said he has known that the modeling error existed and that he had been trying to find it for about a decade. “But I didn’t know what the error was,” he told Weaver. “I just knew they’d made a mistake.” He also says he knew that because he is “a classical mathematician,” which is based on the findings of Menaechmus of Alopeconnesus (380-320 BC).

 

As further reported by The New American, Monckton—a climate realist and former science advisor to the late British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher—showed during his conference presentation that the so-called “red flags” of climate change based largely on United Nations data were nearly all wrong. Because of this and other problems associated with the UN, he then proposed that both Britain and the U.S. leave the UN, even though Monckton has been a regular at UN “climate” summits around the world, to expose their fraud and mock their phony findings and made-up data. He even dropped into one such event held in South Africa with a parachute.

 

Tired of seeing bad policy made on phony narratives

Monckton’s instincts were spot-on, as noted by an earlier report from The Daily Caller noting that 95 percent of climate models predicting rising temperatures have been wrong.

Dr. Roy Spencer, a former scientist for NASA, says climate models relied on by the federal government (which has been all-in pushing this hoax under President Obama) to create actual policies “have failed miserably.” So not only is the science incorrect, but actual government policies are being based on these failed models. (Stay informed on real science at Scientific.news)

 

Spencer said he examined 90 climate models and compared them to real surface temperatures and satellite temperature data; he found more than 95 percent of the models “have over-forecast the warming trends since 1979, whether we use their own surface temperature dataset (HadCRUT4), or our satellite dataset of lower tropospheric temperatures (UAH).”

 

On his blog, Spencer wrote that he had grown tired of well-used and oft-cited statements since the 1950s that “most warming” is “human-caused,” or “97% of climate scientists agree humans are contributing to warming” (a lie), neither of which led to any demonstrable conclusion that proved the claims. He said such statements also should not have led government policymakers to conclude that “we need to substantially increase energy prices and freeze and starve more people to death for the greater good.” And yet, that’s exactly the direction all of the policy is going.

 

 

Related Information

BigGovernment.news

 

 

Share

Tags:
Share

Article Source

 

 

Climate change (Global Warming)

 

The year 2014, according to global warming proponents, was supposed to be the hottest year ever on Planet Earth, bringing with it horrible natural calamities all caused by billions of humans flogging natural resources and living irresponsibly. There was supposed to be a huge melt-off of sea ice in Antarctica, but conversely there was record sea ice there, so much that a global warming expedition ended up getting their boat stuck. Even Arctic sea ice increased, and the Great lakes only had three ice free months the whole year. Across the globe, record snowfall was experienced, as climate change activists and the mass media tried their best NOT to cover these anti-warming “events.” Record cold days were recorded instead of record heat days. Al Gore was proven by Mother Nature to be completely wrong all along. (1)

 

As stated by the Health Ranger, Mike Adams: “The following charts show you something that most climate change proponents have simply never seen: The true history of CO2 level variation and global temperature variation throughout Earth’s known history. This first chart reveals how atmospheric CO2 was at nearly 7000 ppm in the Cambrian period, over 4000 ppb during the Devonian period, over 2500 ppm during the Jurassic period and has plummeted to nearly its lowest point in Earth’s history today, at around 400 ppm. At the same time, Earth’s average global temperature has gone through several cycles, varying roughly from 12 C to 22 C, and it currently stands at nearly its lowest average point in Earth’s history.”

http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-03-25-science-quiz-95-of-status-quo-scientists-fail.html

Even the oceans have been rising much less than predicted by the alarmists and the globalists, who have been spreading propaganda right and left across the media, especially every time there is any severe weather event. In fact, Al Gore predicted the oceans would swallow up coastlines within the century, after rising upwards of twenty feet, yet tide gauges show little to no rise in sea level at all, and none over the past twenty years. The Polar bears are doing just fine, and moose in Minnesota are making their comeback (despite wolves killing them and previously endangering their species). (2)

 

More than 30,000 scientists say “Catastrophic Man-Made Global Warming” is a complete hoax and a lie based on ZERO scientific evidence

Mass media recently spread a great lie across the TV news, newspapers, magazines, and the internet. Most Americans now believe that “99% of scientists believe in global warming,” even though that statistic is completely fabricated, warped, skewed, and comes from a study where only 75 cherry-picked scientists were “interviewed.” Since that propaganda was disseminated across the lame-stream media outlets, 31,000 honest scientists have come forward and signed a petition saying they don’t believe in this “man-made” hoax that’s being perpetuated for billions of dollars in profit by the globalists, their cohorts, and their political minions. (3)

 

In actuality, nature produces way more CO2 than man. Here’s proof. In that same year, 2014, less than three years ago, NASA launched a satellite measuring CO2 levels from around the planet and realized in their findings that the majority of CO2 was coming from rainforests in China, Africa, and South America, rather than from industrialized nations of the northern hemisphere, as the shills of global warming would have us believe in order to suit their money-making scheme and agenda. (7)

 

Zero global warming activity on Earth over the past 18 years

Climate change alarmists use cherry-picked data and even statistics from the wrong areas to make fuel their false narrative. Using ground weather stations that are influenced heavily by pavement and “cemented” cities, also known as the “Urban Heat Island Effect,” global warming hysteria has been promoted, completely ignoring real, accurate data (5) that disproves their concocted theories entirely. The filthy rich elitists push a narrative to which they themselves are complete hypocrites, flying around in leer jets, preaching propaganda to the world about the rest of us wasting resources and adding to the problem. Al Gore actually profits from carbon taxes and other laws governing green energy, while living a lifestyle completely hypocritical to what he preaches. (4)

There currently exists an entire network of politicians, corporations, and scientific shills who promote a lie that stands to pad their pockets to the tune of over $20 billion per year, and that’s tax payer money. These lying elitists are bankrolling $40,000 per minute by spreading one of the greatest hoaxes and Ponzi schemes the world has ever known–and it’s called “man-made global warming.” (6)

 

Government insider, NASA consultant, climate prediction expert, and top scientist blows the whistle on climate change scam

A former White House space program advisor, space shuttle engineer, and consultant to NASA headquarters has been directing critical scientific programs for 35 years, including conducting classified research. Retired senior NASA atmospheric scientist John L. Casey, was the supervisor to Al Gore’s closest cohort in the promotion of man-made global warming fears, one James Hansen–soothsayer extraordinaire. Casey said that Hansen “embarrassed NASA” with his alarming climate propaganda. With Casey’s professional (and courageous) assessment of the whole hoax, thousands of scientists are now coming forwards with their complete abandonment of the theory that environmental pollutants originating from human activity are causing earth’s temperatures to rise on average at some alarming rate, or even at all. (8)

 

This is not to say that these scientists are not in agreement that the clearing of rainforests, the spreading of pesticides, and the flogging of natural resources doesn’t have a profound impact on ecological conditions and environmental welfare, but the temperature on earth is certainly NOT rising because of human activity. This is the true consensus, despite what mainstream (aka lamestream) media is purporting. The anthropogenic global warming fears are all propaganda that are part of Big Government control agendas to rake in billions of dollars off the hard working masses, with their permission. Remember, this is all according to the retired senior NASA atmospheric scientist that Congress brought in to investigate why critical systems failed the 1986 space shuttle Challenger, which tragically exploded and killed the seven crew members. (9)

 

NASA and the bureaucrats of Washington DC trusted John Casey’s highly technical and superior engineering credentials to investigate this occurrence, so why wouldn’t he be reliable and forthright when assessing the whole climate change debacle? (10)

 

April, 2007: Retired senior NASA atmospheric scientist John L. Casey comes out of retirement to declare global warming a HOAX

The world is actually about 1 degree cooler than it was 20 years ago, with cooler summers and longer winters. The oceans are not getting warmer. The North Polar ice cap is actually increasing in size. Your automobile and the factory downtown are not making the weather hotter. Sure, the liberal media and their paid scientist shills, hacks, and charlatans are all screaming in their arguments that its all the humans’ fault, but the only ones behind the real HOAX are the ones who stand to gain financially from it, and in the biggest ways.

nasa graph

May 16, 2014: Obama tweets “97% of scientists agree: climate change is real, man-made and dangerous.” Still, it’s all a farce based on completely manipulated and botched science. Even the Wall Street Journal reported that global warming is fiction and based entirely on unsubstantiated claims. (15)

 

In actuality, less than 1% of scientists believe that human activity is causing climate change. There is simply NO convincing evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or even greenhouse gases can heat up the Earth’s atmosphere. To the laymen without a science background maybe it sounds like it could be true, and since it has been shoved down the throats for so long now, millions of people are brainwashed into believing it. After all, many people care about pollution, natural resources, animals’ livelihood, natural produce, sustainable agriculture, preserving nature and rainforests, and so on, so it’s only common nature to want to support something that sounds positive, as if our actions can prevent the “end of the world” as we know it. However, in that same light, every time there’s a flood, a drought, or a heat wave, the mass media jumps all over it and screams “See! We told you so.”

 

Bottom line: There has always been and will always be climate change. Still, the heat wave that rocked America in the 1930s certainly wasn’t because of human “irresponsibility.” So how is today any different? It’s not.

 

The forbidden theme in the scientific community – solar cycles

Solar cycles, it turns out, are the “arch enemy” argument against man-made global warming. They are the “kryptonite,” if you will, of the “Super Hoax.” John Casey found multiple solar cycles that change the temperatures on Earth, and they’re even fairly predictable! These cycles revealed decades ago that the 1990s would be warmer than usual, and then it would cool back down for decades. In order to perpetuate the climate change hoax, the NOAA, National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration, has been adjusting its statistics and graphs and replacing them with fabricated, false data using simulated computer models, instead of scientific factual data, which would disprove all of their lies.
real climate change graph global warming graph 2

Politicians are demanding the United Nations change their own climate reports to fit the man-made global warming multi-billion-dollar business agenda. Scientific and academic shills are simply publishing whatever the politicians and corporate nihilists tell them they want to share on mass media, just as the biotechnology Big-Ag industry does with GMO technology “studies.”

 

The “Solar Grand Maximum” (SGM) creates global warming and cooling, not humans and their antics

Every single global warming alarmist stops talking when someone simply says the words, “Solar Grand Maximum.” In fact, the solar grand maximum has ended, thus ending the “global warming” trend the alarmists have been pushing on Americans for two decades. You see, there are no humans on Mars, Pluto, or Jupiter, where planetary warming has been observed during the decades following the peak of the SGM. Climate changes on Earth are due to solar changes and our interstellar environment, not human behavior. We are arrogant and egotistical to believe in such a preposterous theory. The SGM is now moving into a solar grand minimum.

 

That means global cooling (a mini Ice Age) is on the horizon, which is simply a natural oscillation that occurs in very long solar cycles. In complete contradiction to the climate change hoax being perpetuated via social media and mass media today, true science reveals that sharp increases in global warming actually PRECEDE sharp increases in CO2, and not the other way around. Therefore, the Earth’s oceans are beginning to cool. Upon closer look, temperatures that span the last 100 years correlate with ocean cycles more than they correlate with carbon dioxide, and those ocean cycles are caused by solar and lunar cycles.

 

These facts are what every single global warming alarmist must ignore, blackout, and completely avoid to be able to push their false narrative. Global warming is completely fear-based. Sure, humans contribute to greenhouse gases, but the cumulative effect is a miniscule fraction compared to the natural causes, and to say humans are THE cause of climate change is all one big scare tactic fueling the mass hysteria for the biggest Ponzi scheme ever known to mankind – even bigger than the military industrial war complex.

 

World’s largest and most lucrative Ponzi scheme – Climate Control

 

2001: Al Gore’s net worth $2 million

2016: Al Gore’s net worth $100 million

 

Before leaving office as Clinton’s VP, Al Gore was not what most consider a “filthy” rich man, but thanks to the global warming SCAM, he’s now worth a cool $100 million. Gore invested in fake “green tech” companies and embezzled the loans and grants, then watched all those companies go bankrupt (all as part of the plan from the beginning). With no intentions whatsoever of funding companies that would build wind mills, or wind turbines, or solar panels, and use natural energy to help the environments and ecosystems, Al Gore is the fulcrum of the world’s largest and most lucrative Ponzi scheme – Climate Control.

 

Barrack Hussein Obama works the same plot and ploys, embezzling money from companies like Solyndra, where he grants them money up front, and they return part of that in campaign contributions, fueling his Ponzi schemes to stop the … “destructive power of a warming planet.” Essentially, Obama used taxpayer monies to fund his re-election campaign, by channeling it through fake green companies that never come to be anything productive. In fact, Solyndra became return investment for Goldman Sachs when they took it over after the “fall.” Other federal loans to the tune of $400 million were all but given to companies like Abound Solar, which of course, went bankrupt too, along with over 100 different “green” companies. Solar, along with the others, all give a portion of their riches back to the Democratic campaigns by the hundreds of thousands. Greedy scientists, academic shills, and even the EPA, the Environmental Protection Agency, also participate in the money laundering scheme to make it all sound official.

 

The billionaires get richer while American taxpayers invest in a Ponzi scheme with no return except some temporary quelled fears about the burning temperature of Earth being staved off by some rogue, criminal politicians and globalists. (17) This is how the global scam adds up to billions and billions and even trillions of dollars. Now you see why the narrative is pushed SO HARD in the mass media. The criminal politicians are still using any extreme weather event to push their false narrative, including the recent floods that are devastating Louisiana. (18) (19) The EPA and Al Gore know no bounds. Meanwhile, the alarmists fly around in jets burning fossil fuel and lecturing people on how burning fossil fuel is warming the planet. It’s complete hypocrisy hurled at the taxpayers who live in fear while paying for a huge lie, all while the planet’s temperature gets a little milder.

 

Daily Caller shows how the NOAA manipulated temperature records to fake a present and past warming trend

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration altered data and recreated temperature graphs, so that any skeptic Americans doing their own research would find the false statistics and fall in compliance with believing the myth of global warming. Knowing that the year 1936 was warmer than the year 2012, NASA scientists and climatologists had to alter data to convince Americans that the wildfires and droughts around the country were the result of careless living by humans who aren’t doing enough to halt global warming. NOAA claimed 2012 was the hottest July since 1985, but they lied. The agency had removed data from 1936, and then later on, after getting busted for fraud, reinstated that data as the hottest month on record in the US. It all served the narrative just long enough, and most Americans will never know what took place, as long as the mass media outlets only publish what fits their agenda. It’s business as usual in Washington DC.

 

World temperatures have been COOLING since the 1930s

Raw data proves that there is no global warming taking place. Mountains of scientific evidence hidden from the masses show this fact in the form of raw data. If the NOAA had not replaced real temperatures with fabricated computer model data, everyone would know that “global warming” in not the trend, and that it’s just one huge scheme to make money while instilling fear in taxpayers, much like the domestic terror narrative today. It’s not just an error with grids that the NOAA made, but rather it’s a planned plot to deceive Americans and it violates the Data Quality Act. Now, the “Paris global warming treaty” is being promoted by the EU along with the US administration, and that false narrative is part of the reason for the recent “Brexit” – where the British people realized the global and government fraud that was ruining their country and helped them decide to escape from the dictatorial grasp of the EU bureaucracy and criminal Big Government.

 

CLEXIT (Climate Exit) is the new international organization aimed at preventing ratification of costly Ponzi scheme of global warming/climate change

Clexit was inspired by the Brexit decision and has attracted renowned scientists, business leaders, and economic leaders from around the world who know that global warming is a scam and are fighting to prevent the Paris Treaty from ending low cost hydrocarbon transport and other energy innovations. Low-cost hydrocarbon energy and natural energy undermines the corporate infrastructure that steals money from taxpayers and keeps the government and ruthless corporations in complete control.

 

Also, the UN climate plane called the “Green Climate Fund” is simply another Ponzi scheme where developing and emerging nations are forced to dump money into “green slush funds” where “green” companies, again, put up their fake fronts and then go bankrupt shortly thereafter, all so that billionaires can put massive amounts of cash in their pockets, all under the guise of helping keep the planet cool.

 

The biggest lie for depopulation agenda: Having less children helps with global warming!

The ultimate Big Government and globalist agenda is to reduce the world’s population by about 5 billion over the next few decades. There are several genocidal methods for accomplishing this, including force-feeding people genetically modified, pesticide-laden food (GMO), force-vaccinating children, the elderly, and pregnant women with sterilizing chemicals, and of course, convincing everyone to stop having children in order to keep the earth from “burning up.” Bill Gates (20) and George Soros (21) are two of the world’s richest contributors to this insidious agenda. In other words, they’re telling us we can save the children by not having any. The latest scandal in this regards taxing childbirth. (11)

 

After that, America may even resort to a communist rule of law that limits the amount of children a family can birth, like China, where only one child is allowed and any more are literally executed. This is now part of the mentality carried over through fear about climate change and how you can be a part of the global Ponzi scheme to help lower temperatures and save the next generation. You see, without public brainwashing and participation, the great money laundering scheme would die. Not having children, according to a philosopher at the Berman Institute of Bioethics at Johns Hopkins University, is a “moral duty.” Want to prevent flooding? Stop having children. Want to feed starving nations of people for generations to come? Get your babies vaccinated with sterilization chemicals. Want to leave this planet sooner so you’re not a burden? Eat GMO and get cancer and die young.

 

Climate change “expert” jailed for embezzling nearly $1 million from EPA

John C. Beale confessed to defrauding the government and was sentenced to nearly 3 years in federal prison for claiming he was a CIA agent in order to get a rush from the excitement of lying to people. Beale was the EPA’s top climate change expert and highest paid employee. Beale confessed in court that he was ashamed of his greed and the scam he ran for over a decade. (13) Beale would claim he was at work while he was actually at his vacation home in Cape Cod reading, doing housework, or riding his bicycle. Beale billed taxpayers for nearly a quarter million dollars for his 30 first-class plane flights for personal trips to California and London, where he stayed in 5-star hotels, took limo rides, and ate the most expensive meals available. He also drew a salary all the while for over $200,000 per year, and even threw a retirement party for himself. The EPA staff said Beale perpetrated a crime of epic proportions and that he is a “poster child for what is wrong with the government.” (12)

 

How did Beale get away with his scam for so long? Because the EPA is one huge scam, run like a criminal racket of a business instead of a regulatory agency. The culture of the EPA makes it ripe for fraud, including propagating the myth of global warming. Mr. Beale was a senior policy advisor who worked for years as one of the EPA’s top climate change experts, defrauding the American public while furthering the insidious agenda that steals taxpayer money for a scheme that doesn’t even improve or protect the environment in any way, shape or form. It’s simply pathetic. (14)

 

Beale is married to Nancy Kete, a woman that President Obama appointed to the National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling. She is also the managing director of the Rockefeller Foundation, one of the most insidious foundations on Earth that also fuels eugenics and mass genocide, and has done so ever since the second World War. (22)

 

Sources:

(1) http://www.newsmax.com/Finance/MKTNews/Global-Warming-climate-change/2014/11/17/id/607827/

(2) http://www.naturalnews.com/025895_global_warming_climate_change_government.html

(3) http://www.naturalnews.com/045808_global_warming_fraud_data_manipulation_NOAA.html

(4) http://dailycaller.com/2014/06/30/noaa-quietly-reinstates-july-1936-as-the-hottest-month-on-record/

(5) http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/03aug_summer2012/

(6) http://www.globalclimatescam.com/

(7) http://www.globalclimatescam.com/opinion/after-brexit-clexit/

(8) http://clexit.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/clexit.pdf

(9) http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/20/business/energy-environment/how-renewable-energy-is-blowing-climate-change-efforts-off-course.html?rref=collection%2Fcolumn%2FEconomic%20Scene&action=click&contentCollection=Economy&module=Collection&r&_r=0

(10) http://www.globalclimatescam.com/opinion/top-ten-reasons-climate-change-is-a-hoax/

(11) http://www.naturalnews.com/055084_globalists_childbirth_tax_climate_change.html

(12) http://www.naturalnews.com/053820_EPA_fraud_and_corruption_John_C_Beale.html

(13) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2526051/John-C-Beale-climate-change-expert-defrauded-EPA-900K-claiming-CIA-agent.html

(14) http://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases-all?ID=1a5e6e32-802a-23ad-40ed-ecd53cd3d320

(15) http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303480304579578462813553136

(16) http://www.lunarplanner.com/SolarCycles-climate.html

(17) http://dailycaller.com/2014/12/08/112-solar-companies-have-closed-their-doors-in-5-years/

(18) http://www.climatedepot.com/2016/08/23/al-gore-climate-activists-use-louisiana-floods-to-push-narrative-without-evidence-of-link/

(19) http://www.climatedepot.com/2016/08/24/epa-warns-pregnant-climate-change-can-increase-health-risks-for-you-and-your-baby-learn-what-you-can-do/

(20) http://www.truthwiki.org/george-soros/

(21) http://www.truthwiki.org/bill-gates-bill-and-melinda-gates-foundation/

(22) http://www.truthwiki.org/rockefeller-foundation/

Share

Share

 

 

The Presidents decision to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement is sure to result in extreme backlash and the promotion of mass hysteria from the radical liberal left and the liberal media. But the truth of the matter is the facts and economics don’t necessarily justify the hysteria.I have been writing for years that ratifications of agreements like this are power and cash grabs by wealthy, sexually perverse liberals,in positions of power.

 

With the ultimate goal of using it as a form of control to force poor and economically disadvantaged countries as well as developed countries to conform to their sexually perverse goals and agenda.Using the newly acquired wealth and power as a result of ratification of these kinds of agreements,as a way to accomplish it.An agenda which includes the further promotion of corrupting, destructive, perverse homosexual behavior worldwide, as well as the legalization of pedophilia,transgenderism and many other forms of twisted, perverse sexual behavior.

 

But the creation of green jobs, etc, in my opinion is secondary in nature and a cloak for the transfer of massive wealth into the hands of sexually perverse, powerful liberals, for the worldwide advancement of a more destructive, diabolical agenda.Creating skilled workers as a response to the anticipation of the possible future growth of green jobs, as those jobs are created,and the demand for workers to fill those jobs increases? Yes. But the transfer of massive wealth into the hands of radical, sexually perverse liberals? Absolutely not.In fact if you are wise and able to do it you should be working to dry up all their revenue sources as opposed to making them richer and wealthier.

 

The ratification of this and similar agreements in my opinion is part of a worldwide scheme to accomplish it.Not to mention using that wealth and power to procure more political power and influence.And the continued promotion of impending doom by the liberal media as a result of withdrawing from the agreement is baseless in fact.

 

The continued promotion of impending doom by the liberal media is designed in part, to make this a political issue in future elections, and presidential elections.It’s also been pointed out that hundreds of billions of dollars of funding delegated towards controlling man made climate change will be unaccounted for. I wonder who’s pockets that money will just vanish into?

 

And going along with the argument and supporting the theory to insure success in future elections will prove disastrous in the end, because you will in essence be relinquishing power and control to wealthy, radical liberals in positions of power.By allowing them to make this a campaign issue as a result of allowing them to continue to promote this as a serious threat to mankind. That deceptive,misleading narrative, needs to be countered.

 

If the climate is warming you can rest assured it’s probably by the hand of God as he’s setting the stage to do what he promised to do in terms of punishing the nations because of their sins through destructive weather events and not as a result of man made climate change.

 

When these predictions of destructive weather events begin to happen it will be by the hand of God because of the sins of nations, and not as a result of man made climate change.I emphasized years ago that the liberal media,the radical liberal left, and climate scientists would try to argue that man made climate change would be the cause, as a way to discredit God and his word and give credence to their predictions of impending doom. Thereby deceptively establishing their own credibility in regards to this issue and working to diminish God’s. But the bible predicted these destructive weather events would happen centuries before a climate scientist or meteorologist ever existed.So they can’t take credit for this.

 

If you want to  change the outcome change your moral position and direction, as it relates to the more serious and abominable sins.If God has purposed to punish a nation or nations for their sins, all the reduction in green house gas emissions and carbon footprints, wont matter one bit.His will is still going to be performed. The only way to insure your future survival is to heed his warnings and obey.

 

But the promotion of  man made climate change as something of extreme importance that needs to be urgently resolved, needs to be countered by honest, accurate, news reporting. One of the points used to argue for justification of ratification is the claim that over 90% of scientist are in agreement with the fact that the climate is warming, and that may be the case, but not as it relates catastrophic warming, but cyclical warming.

 

So when they claim over 90% of scientist are in agreement the climate is warming, in reality it’s in regards to the cyclical warming cycle of the planet. Which most scientist agree takes place and has taken place for hundreds and even thousands of years in cyclical periods as a natural occurrence and natural planetary function.But as it relates to catastrophic warming the truth of the matter is only around 47% of scientist believe that it’s warming in that context and most of those are government funded scientist.

 

The over 90% percent suggestion is a myth and is a result of several flawed studies. And that point and many other facts need to be emphasized as aggressively as the other.So the argument that it’s man made warming and the warming is tantamount to worldwide impending doom, is very deceptive and misleading in nature.

 

Because if not the liberal media will continue to unjustifiably engage in the promotion of mass hysteria. This is not about liberals concern for the climate,as much as it’s about the transfer of massive amounts of wealth,power and control, into the hands of wealthy, sexually perverse liberals, in positions of power.As they use the ratification of treaties like this as money and power grabs, for the advancement of a more destructive and diabolical agenda worldwide, I’m convinced.

 

 

Related Information

Is There A More Diabolical Motive Behind The Global Warming Scare?

 

Why I Stopped Believing in Man-made Global Warming and Became a Climate Skeptic

 

 

Mathematical Proof That Man-Made Climate Change Is A Total Hoax.

 

Climate change (global warming)

 

 

Hoax or Fact? Man-Made Climate Change

Climate change: This Is The Worst Scientific Scandal Of Our Generation

 

Climate Change

 

9 Things You Need To Know About The Climate Change Hoax

 

Man Made Climate Change Hype

  

Debunking The Top Five Man Made Climate Change Myths

 

 

John Coleman Founder Of The Weather Channel Exposes Man Made Climate Change As a Hoax. 

 

Lord Christopher Monckton Ends The Global Warming Debate And Proves Its A Hoax

 

 The Continued,Repetitive,Debunking Of The Man Climate Change Hoax/Fraud.

 

The Founder Of The Weather Channel Continues To Debunk The Man Made Climate Change Fraud.

 

The Science Behind Global Warming Hysteria.

 

The Man Made Climate Change Deception.

 

Is Man Made Climate Change Now Indisputable?

 

The Great Global Warming Swindle.

 

 

Related articles:

Australia Reining in Climate Schemes After Voters Reject Carbon Tax

Top Scientists Slam and Ridicule UN IPCC Climate Report

UN Carbon Regime Would Devastate Humanity

Australia Votes to Crush Carbon Tax and Big Government

Arctic Ice Expands, Dispelling Myths of Climate Change

Australia’s Carbon Tax Contributing to Record Business Failures

Carbon Tax Bad for Australian Hospitals’ Health

Climate Theories Crumble as Data and Experts Suggest Global Cooling

Poll: Australian “Carbon Tax” Wildly Unpopular

“Climate Science” in Shambles: Real Scientists Battle UN Agenda

Global-warming Alarmism Dying a Slow Death

Despite Lack of Global Warming, UN Sure Humanity Is to Blame

Obama & Allies Tell UN to Cover for Lack of Global Warming

Amid UN Climate Deception, Experts Decry Corruption of Science

Obama EPA Climate Decrees Will Further Damage U.S. Economy

The Real Agenda Behind UN “Sustainability” Unmasked

IPCC Researchers Admit Global Warming Fraud

Share

Share

In this Oct. 5, 2016 photo, Hemlock woolly adelgids on hemlock tree needles are seen through a microscope at a lab in Petersham, Mass. No larger than a speck of pepper, the Hemlock woolly adelgid spends its life on the underside of needles sucking sap and eventually killing the tree. The aphid-like bug is part of an expanding army of insects draining the life out of forests from New England to the West Coast. (AP Photo/Elise Amendola)

 

© The Associated Press In this Oct. 5, 2016 photo, Hemlock woolly adelgids on hemlock tree needles are seen through a microscope at a lab in Petersham, Mass. No larger than a speck of pepper, the Hemloc…While all 50 states have been attacked by pests, experts say forests in the Northeast, California, Colorado and parts of the Midwest, North Carolina and Florida are especially at risk. Forests in some states, like New York, are close to major trade routes, while others, like in Florida, house trees especially susceptible to pests. Others, like New Hampshire, Massachusetts and Maine, are experiencing record warming.

 

Related Information

How To Distinguish The Wrath Of God From The Wrath Of Satan

 

 

PETERSHAM, Mass. — In a towering forest of centuries-old eastern hemlocks, it’s easy to miss one of the tree’s nemeses. No larger than a speck of pepper, the Hemlock woolly adelgid spends its life on the underside of needles sucking sap, eventually killing the tree.

 

The bug is one in an expanding army of insects draining the life out of forests from New England to the West Coast. Aided by drought-weakened trees, the invaders have become one of the greatest threats to biodiversity in the United States.

 

Scientists say they already are driving some tree species toward extinction and are causing billions of dollars a year in damage — and the situation is expected to worsen.

“They are one of the few things that can actually eliminate a forest tree species in pretty short order — within years,” said Harvard University ecologist David Orwig as he walked past dead hemlocks scattered across the university’s 5.8-square-mile research forest in Petersham.

 

This scourge is projected to put 63 percent of the country’s forest at risk through 2027 and carries a cost of several billion dollars annually in dead tree removal, declining property values and timber industry losses, according to a peer-reviewed study this year in Ecological Applications.

 

That examination, by more than a dozen experts, found that hundreds of pests have invaded the nation’s forests, and that the emerald ash borer alone has the potential to cause $12.7 billion in damage by 2020.

 

Insect pests, some native and others from as far away as Asia, can undermine forest ecosystems. For example, scientists say, several species of hemlock and almost 20 species of ash could nearly go extinct in the coming decades. Such destruction would do away with shelter for birds and insects and food sources for bears and other animals. Dead forests also can increase the danger of catastrophic wildfires.

 

Today’s connected world enables foreign invaders to cross oceans in packing materials or on garden plants, and then reach American forests. Once here, they have rapidly expanded their ranges.

 

 

“The primary driver of the invasive pest problem is globalization, which includes increased trade and travel,” Andrew Liebhold, a Forest Service research entomologist in West Virginia.

 

The emerald ash borer, first found in 2002 in Michigan, is now in 30 states and has killed hundreds of millions of ash trees. The gypsy moth, discovered in 1869 in Boston, is now found in 20 states and has reached the northern Great Lakes, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

 

Native bark beetles have taken advantage of drought conditions and a long western drought to rapidly range from Mexico into Canada. An outbreak in Colorado spread across 3.4 million acres of forest from 1996 to 2013, according to the Forest Service, and in California 100 million-plus trees have died in the Sierra Nevada since 2010.

 

Though small, bugs can easily overwhelm big trees with sheer numbers.

“They drain the resin that otherwise defends the tree,” said Matt Ayres, a Dartmouth College ecologist who worked on the Ecological Applications study. “Then, the tree is toast.”

 

Forest pests in the era of drought are especially concerning for timberland owners, said Jasen Stock, executive director of the New Hampshire Timberland Owners Association.

“We’re dealing with pests we’ve never been around before, never had to manage around before,” Stock said. “It’s something we’re going to be dealing with forever.”

 

Urban forests, too, are at risk from outbreaks. In Worcester, Massachusetts, a city of about 180,000, an Asian longhorned beetle infestation in 2008 resulted in the removal of 31,000 trees.

“You would leave for work with a tree-lined street, and you come back and there was not a tree in sight,” recalled Ruth Seward, executive director of the nonprofit Worchester Tree Initiative. Most trees have since been replaced.

 

Though trees can die off quickly, the impact of pests on a forest ecosystem can take decades to play out. Dead hemlocks, for example, are giving way to black birch and other hardwoods. Gone are favorite nesting spots for two types of warblers, as well as the bark that red squirrels love to eat, Harvard’s Orwig said. The birds won’t die off, he said, but their ranges will be restricted.

 

“It’s a great example of how one species can make a difference in the forest,” Orwig said.

As pests proliferate, scientists seek to contain them.

Among the methods are bio controls, in which bugs that feed upon pests in their native lands are introduced here. Of the 30 states with emerald ash borer outbreaks, the USDA says 24 have released wasp species to combat them. Some scientists worry about introducing another pest; others complain they aren’t effective because they can’t eat enough of the fast-breeding pests to make a difference.

 

“With all bio controls, the hope is to create balance — balance between predator and prey,” said Ken Gooch, forest health program director for the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation.

 

An alternative strategy, also a slow one, is to plant trees 50 or 100 miles away from their normal range so they can escape pests, or adapt to a more favorable climate, said Steven Strauss, a professor of forest biotechnology at Oregon State University.

 

“Mother Nature knows best,” he said. “It’s assisted migration.”

 

To stop the next pest from entering the country, researchers like Gary M. Lovett, of the Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies in New York, propose measures such as switching from solid wood shipping material that can harbor insects and restricting shrub and tree imports.

 

Nonetheless, Lovett said new pests are inevitable.

___

Whittle reported from Portland, Maine. Associated Press writer Michael Hill in Syracuse, New York, contributed to this report.

 

 

Related Information

How To Distinguish The Wrath Of God From The Wrath Of Satan

Share

Tags:
Share

 

 

Related Articles

Bernie Sanders And The Progressive, Socialist, Homosexual Agenda?

 

Man Made Climate Change Hype And Deception

 

Share

Tags:
Share

 

 

President Obama has ratified a climate agreement with China.But whats the purpose? Because there is no such thing as man made climate change that’s threatening the existence of man. And statements like 97% of scientist are in agreement that the climate is warming due to man made activity outlined in the video above is woefully inaccurate, downright deceptive,and is simply a big lie and an example of more man made climate change propaganda that’s being promoted by the liberal mainstream media. The made made climate change myth has been debunked so many times I have lost count. But yet the Jewish owned and run liberal mainstream media continues to promote the false narrative and blatant lie. 

 

 

 

Related Information

Climate Change

 

Man Made Climate Change Hype

  

Debunking The Top Five Man Made Climate Change Myths

TwitterGoogle+EmailPinterestGoogle GmailYahoo Mail
Share

Tags:
Share

Share

Tags: ,

Powered by Wordpress
Theme © 2005 - 2009 FrederikM.de
BlueMod is a modification of the blueblog_DE Theme by Oliver Wunder
Translate »